Who Taxes Are They?
October 31, 2020Donation/Gifts
August 9, 2022
Pro 18:21 Death and life are in the power of the tongue: and they that love it shall eat the fruit thereof.
The Art of Words!
Luke 7:30 But the Pharisees and lawyers rejected the counsel (Law of Yeshua) against themselves, being not baptized of him.
Luke 11:45-46 Then answered one of the lawyers, and said unto him, Master, thus saying thou reproachest us also. And he said, Woe unto you also, ye lawyers! for ye lade men with burdens grievous to be borne, and ye yourselves touch not the burdens with one of your fingers.
Luke 11:52 Woe unto you, lawyers! for ye have taken away the key of knowledge: ye entered not in yourselves, and them that were entering in ye hindered, day and night.
Genesis 2:16-17 The first word God spake to man was a blessing; the second word was a law. We might have anticipated this. It seems the natural expression of the relationship which exists between the Creator and His creature. The commandment given was a very simple one, "Thou shalt not eat of the tree of knowledge." In this particular evening of creation, Adam's soul, filled to overflowing with gladness, was ready to break forth, and say, "What shall I render unto the Lord for all his benefits toward me?" No thank offering could have seemed too great for God, no tribute of love too costly. The language of his worship could only be, "Of thine own, I give thee." And yet it was a little thing which God asked of man, for" to obey is better than sacrifice." Think, how great, how abounding was the provision for Adam; how narrow the prohibition. It was a small thing that God demanded; but a great ruin was involved in the withholding of obedience. So lets take a closer look at how the (false Advocate) using the art of words, in the Garden to remove Adam from his throne and altered his relationship with Yeshua!
The Fall
The Command (LAW): Gen 2:16-17 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Watch the Art of Words and spin of both parties in this exchange:
Gen 3:1 Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?
Gen 3:2 And the woman said unto the serpent, We may eat of the fruit of the trees of the garden:
Gen 3:3 But of the fruit of the tree (?) which is in the midst of the garden, God hath said, Ye shall not eat of it, neither shall ye touch it, lest ye die.
Gen 3:4 And the serpent said unto the woman, Ye shall not surely die:
Gen 3:5 For God doth know that in the day ye eat thereof, then your eyes shall be opened, and ye shall be as gods, knowing good and evil.
Gen 3:6 And when the woman saw that the tree was good for food, and that it was pleasant to the eyes, and a tree to be desired to make one wise, she took of the fruit thereof, and did eat, and gave also unto her husband with her; and he did eat. (Lets pause for a moment to let this sink in!)
The Understanding of LAW
A system or systems of rules established by a governing authority to institute and maintain orderly coexistence. The rule of law requires the government (King Yeshua along with the Host of Heaven) to exercise its power in accordance with well-established and clearly written rules, regulations, and legal principles (The Holy Bible/TORAH). Also any system (or part of that system) that creates or recognizes rights, duties, or obligations, and provides a forum through which to seek a remedy in the event that any of those rights, duties, or obligations are breached.
Shall the throne of iniquity have fellowship with thee, which frameth "mischief" by a law? Psa 94:20
Wow! King David was asking Yeshua a valid question from a position of Authority, How Satan throne has equality with Yeshua Throne!. As we will discover through out this lesson the key is "The Art of Words" that lawyers practice throughout there profession from the beginning of Creations......Lets look at some examples of "Art of Words" in modern law.
In a republic where open armed warfare of tyrants against their own people would garner massive public resistance, the only tool for conquest are the abuse of words and language as a tool of deception, propaganda, rhetoric, and persuasion. The communists understood this well by censoring the press and granting to themselves control over all press. Joseph Goebbels said on this subject:
“The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic, and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State.” [Joseph Goebbels, German Minister of Propaganda, 1933-1945]
George Orwell also commented on this subject when he wrote the following:
“The great enemy of clear language is insincerity. When there is a gap between one's real and one's declared aims, one turns as it were instinctively to long words and exhausted idioms, like a cuttlefish spurting out ink. “ [George Orwell, "Politics and the English Language", 1946; English essayist, novelist, & satirist (1903 - 1950)]
Governments are SUPPOSED to be created to protect ONLY private rights. When those running government seek to DESTROY and STEAL private rights by converting them to public property and public rights, they must resort to deliberately vague and unclear language in order to disguise their clearly unconstitutional and treasonous activities and breach of the public trust. Like a cuttlefish, they spurt ink called “words of art” that have the opposite meaning to what most people understand in order to deceive the people and thereby subdue public resistance and outcry. When the deception and unconstitutional presumptions the words create is discovered and challenged in a legal setting, they employ omission, legalese, trickery, and exploit the legal ignorance of the average American to avoid the criminal consequences of being discovered.
In essence, criminal public servants abuse the complexity of the law and the ignorance of the average American about the law that THEY manufactured in the public school system to HIDE and CONCEAL what amounts to criminal extortion and racketeering.
THIS was the very thing, the ONLY thing that Jesus ever got angry about when he visited Earth. By “hindering” he really means UNDERSTANDING and IMPLEMENTING what the law requires: "Woe to you lawyers! for you have taken away the keys of knowledge; you did not enter yourselves, and you hindered those who were entering."
[Luke 11:52, INTERPRETATION: woe unto lawyers who write a law to deliberately be confusing or who use or interpret a law that is written in a confusing way to hide the truth or deceive people for their own selfish gain]
It is no accident that Yeshua came to Earth to call the sinners to repentance, and that the first place he visited to find such sinners as, Lawyers, Pharisees and the Tax Office. Mark 2:14. The “keys of knowledge” that Jesus was referring to above are the REAL meaning of the words.
In short: The TRUTH On this subject, Confucius said: “When words lose their meaning, people will lose their liberty.” [Confucius, 500 B.C.]
The Amazing Disappearing Law
Laws do not actually disappear, but their language is altered over time to obscure the true purpose and intent of the law. One would think that once a law is passed it would not need to be altered unless some flaw or shortcoming becomes apparent, or some circumstance changes that requires the statute to keep up with the times. I think the average citizen would be surprised to learn that statutes are amended to alter their language for no apparent reason. We stress the word “apparent” because the legislative draftsmen who propose these changes know exactly what their purpose is.
In the following fictitious example, we are going to provide you with the year that the statute was passed as well as the text. I will then give you the year of each amendment of the statute that changes the prior language. After viewing the progression of the changes, look again at the original version and take note of all the clarity that has been lost. You will see how the changes have rendered it impossible for a person to know the original intent of the law. This practice is more common than you would believe.
" The Art of Words"
Example I:
1959 – It shall be illegal for any foreign corporation to produce widgets except between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Widgets may not be sold without having first obtained a license in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 12345.
1970 - It shall be illegal for any corporation to produce widgets except between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Widgets may not be sold without having first obtained a license in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 12345.
1973 - No corporation shall produce or sell widgets except between the hours of 8:00 a.m. and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday. Widgets may not be sold without having first obtained a license in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 12345.
1979 - No person shall produce or sell widgets except during the times allowed by law. Widgets may not be produced or sold without having first obtained a license in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 12345.
1990 - No person shall produce or sell widgets except in accordance with regulations pertaining to this section. Widgets may not be produced or sold without having first obtained a license in accordance with Business and Professions Code section 12345.
1994 - No person shall produce or sell widgets without first having obtained a license.
What is important for the reader to know is that the intended meaning and application of the law, as indicated by its original language, cannot be altered by amendment! The 1994 versions still means the same exact thing as the 1959 version. If there are any questions as to the proper meaning and application of a law, the prudent person will seek out the earliest possible version of the statute in order to confirm the issues.
The Language of Law
One of the greatest stumbling blocks for the American public in understanding the laws their representatives enact is that laws use words in a different manner than we do in common speech.
There are two kinds of language that are primarily used in law – one is “words” (just as we use in common speech) and the other is “terms” (which can be substantially different than we use in common speech).
“Words” are just that – words. They are presumed to be used in their ordinary manner and they are subject to the “plain meaning rule” when interpreting a statute. Their meaning must be sought through the common English dictionaries of the era in which the statute was written. In the absence of any clear contrary intent by the legislature, the meaning found in these dictionaries is the sole meaning that must be given to the word.
“Terms” are another matter. Terms appear no different, to the layperson, than words. The difference is that terms are not subject to the “plain meaning rule” because the legislature has provided its own definition for the term being used. Where the legislature has provided its own definition, the ordinary English dictionary must be thrown out the window; the definition given to the term by the legislature controls the meaning completely.
The meanings of terms can be identified by seeking out the “definitions” section applicable the text that you are reading. Unfortunately, this may not always be as straight forward a proposition as one might imagine.
Other Important Distinctions
Classifications
Every law that defines an offense falls into one of two categories. The first category is mala in se, and the second is mala prohibita.
A mala in se offense is a crime that is, by the laws of nature and God, a true crime. Examples of this would be, murder, rape, robbery, fraud, etc.
A mala prohibita offense is one that would not be an offense were it not for the legislature passing a law that makes a particular act a punishable offense. Examples of this would be, possessing or smoking marijuana, buying and selling more than 7 cars a year without a dealer’s license (in California), not obeying road signs and speed limits, etc.
The government generally uses the law as an offensive tool to compel the population to comply with its edicts. In most cases the government could care less whether it is acting lawfully, or whether it is even applying the law to the intended persons or property. The government only cares that there is a superficial appearance of legality. Americans can use the law as either an offensive tool or a defensive tool depending on the circumstance and your preference.
Lawyers
Many people despise lawyers. We suspect that much of that is due to various realities of the legal trade ( John 8:44 Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.) and not because the men and women who become lawyers are inherently bad or evil. However, nearly all lawyers have one fatal flaw that damages the law, the truth, your rights, and the very fabric of our nation. The flaw is their unwillingness to argue the law. That may sound odd, but it is true. For the most part, lawyers operate within the courts as officers of the court. Those who do not function within the courts, usually function within the corporate environment. Both the courts, and most corporations, operate within "the system". One might hope that "the system" means our system of laws and court procedures.
Unfortunately, "law" takes a very distant backseat to politics and monetary objectives. Sadly, in the America of the new millennium, "the system" is whatever government bureaucrats, politicians and money-powers say it is. Attorneys understand this, and with rare exception, are unwilling to buck "the system". If we have one direct criticism of lawyers, it is that the majority of them are moral cowards, and there father is the devil as Yeshua stated, not caring what is truly right, nor being willing to fight for it.
We do not wish to leave you with the view that all attorneys are rotten or worthless. Like all professionals, they may serve a purpose at times. However, we encourage you to gain as much legal
expertise as possible on your own through reading and study, and we urge you to not blindly place your faith, you future, your rights, or your possessions, in the hands of attorneys / lawyers because we know that they will generally not serve you well or faithfully.
So as we can see all this started in the Garden with the first Adam & Eve. The Devil has always misused the Law of Yeshua Words "Art of Words" which is the "Mischief of Law" that King David was referring too. So when the second Adam (Yeshua) appeared he set things straight and went straight for the Devils and his priest (Attorneys, Lawyers, Pharisees) concerning how the Law was interpreted and applied.
Ecc 1:9 The thing that hath been, it is that which shall be; and that which is done is that which shall be done: and there is no new thing under the sun.
Your Servant of Yeshua,
Teaching To Enlighten, Not To Excite!
Apostle Gary Carter, Jr
Shalom!
In a republic where open armed warfare of tyrants against their own people would garner massive public resistance, the only tool for conquest are The abuse of words and language as a tool of deception, propaganda, rhetoric, and persuasion.
"The communists understood this well by censoring the press and granting to themselves control over all press.
"The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic, and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension the truth is the greatest enemy of the State"
.
[Joseph Goebbels, German Minister of Propaganda, 1933-1945]